ER
THE TRANSITION from the Presidential Communications Office (KKK) to the Government Communications Agency (BKP) is expected to be more than a mere change in bureaucratic label. Instead, it is anticipated to be a strategic step aimed at fortifying the government’s communications strategy framework in the face of escalating political, social, and technological complexities.
The success of this transformation depends on precise execution, solid cross-sectoral coordination, and the ability to address the challenges posed by government communication problems. This represents a significant shift from a centralized approach to a more comprehensive, holistic orientation, encompassing the entire government ecosystem.
The changes are expected to expand coverage, improve coordination, and reorganize the government. These changes are not just administrative; they are an urgent need to unify the government’s narrative amidst the fragmentation of information and polarization of public opinion.
The agency’s broadened coverage indicates its strategic aim to serve as the government’s primary communications hub. This entails not only overseeing the president’s policy initiatives but also orchestrating messages from various agency ministries.
We are currently experiencing a new era of polarization in public communication.
In the current era, where facts can be easily influenced by public opinion, the need for an entity capable of unifying cross-sectoral narratives is crucial. However, without clear authority and strong coordination mechanisms, this ambition risks getting trapped in a bureaucratic maze.
Improved coordination is an attainable goal, but it is not without its challenges. Cross-ministerial coordination is frequently identified as a critical area for improvement in Indonesian governance, characterized by sectoral egos and message inconsistencies.
The Government Communications Agency must evolve into a conductor that ensures narrative harmony, rather than remaining a passive distributor of information, particularly in the context of social media, which frequently distorts facts. This approach necessitates the implementation of visionary steps and a streamlined organizational structure, eschewing the bureaucracy that can impede responsiveness to critical issues.
Government Communication Expert Joel Netshitenzhe stated that government communication must be based on integrated communication programs and strategies. When executed effectively, organizational restructuring can serve as a catalyst for efficiency, fostering integrated, credible, and accountable government communications.
Expanded Authority
The Government Communications Agency must be granted sufficient authority to effectively navigate the cross-agency communications ecosystem through a “national hub” that fosters collaboration. This will ensure that communication tools in institutional ministries are more effective. In accordance with the role of managing government communications, disseminating information, and handling communication crises.
Managing government communications requires the ability to formulate coherent and resonant narratives that align with public interests. In the Indonesian context, where social and cultural diversity often leads to varied interpretations of policies, this body must be able to craft an inclusive yet firm message.
The Role of social media
The dissemination of information through social media and other channels has become a key aspect of modern communication. In an era where hoaxes and disinformation spread at an alarming rate, the Government Communications Agency must act with urgency, leveraging social media algorithms to reach the intended audience. However, this is not solely a matter of speed. The content is of the highest quality and is authentic.
In this context, it is possible to adopt the methods of developed countries, such as how the White House’s communication strategy enters the millennial generation space, by placing the figure of Caroline Leavitt’s daughter as President Trump’s spokesperson.
Government communications have a history of being less than effective, often appearing defensive and losing momentum in shaping public perceptions. In the future, crisis communication management must prioritize a swift response, sincere empathy, and a quantifiable strategy. Cases such as personal data leaks, natural disaster emergencies, or failure to implement policies often demonstrate the government’s communication strategy’s shortcomings in managing crisis narratives.
In such situations, the Government Communications Agency must have a team that is trained to respond in hours, not days, and is able to embrace criticism without getting trapped in counterproductive defensive patterns.
Establishing Public Trust
The Government Communications Agency has the potential to be a transformative entity in the social media landscape, where facts can be overshadowed by opinions, leveraging the dual impact of social media. For instance, platform X empowers governments to communicate directly with the public.
Conversely, algorithms have the potential to disseminate negative narratives or hoaxes. These agencies must develop a proficiency in digital communications, incorporating data analytics to assess public sentiment and adjust strategies in real-time. Failure to adapt will result in continued inferiority in argumentation and narrative defense.
The key to this process is openness or transparency and trust in the dissemination of government information. It is important to remember that the Indonesian public is becoming increasingly critical and connected in a real-time network that can be difficult to control.
Sensitive issues, such as agrarian conflicts, religious issues, or economic inequality, demand an intelligent and sensitive approach. This agency must be able to embrace diverse perspectives without falling into the trap of polarization. For instance, when dealing with issues such as the relocation of residents affected by infrastructure projects, communication must show empathy while explaining the long-term benefits of the project. This is not an easy task, but without this ability, the body risks becoming vulnerable to criticism.
Towards Responsive Government Communication
The success of the government’s communication strategy depends greatly on the extent to which the Agency is able to overcome bureaucratic inertia and understand the pulse of the public, without getting trapped in a reactive and elitist approach. To achieve this objective, it is essential to implement an antithesis that is more proactive, inclusive, and data-driven.
To this end, the government must establish key performance indicators (KPIs) that can be used to measure success. These KPIs may include factors such as the level of public trust, the effectiveness of the crisis response, or the reach of messages on digital platforms.
Additionally, investing in human resources by training teams in digital communications, data analysis, and crisis management is crucial for success. In the absence of this element, any structural changes will be superficial and lack depth. [sources/photo special]
